apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jean-frederic clere <jfcl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Roll 0.9.15 this week?
Date Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:17:38 GMT
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> 
> On 08/13/2007 09:34 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> On Aug 13, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>> On 08/13/2007 07:38 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>>>> Jim's spearheaded an effort to release httpd-2.0.60 and we've
>>>>> discovered a set of socket issues that need to be corrected by
>>>>> apr-0.9.15.
>>>> How do we plan to address these? Like in 1.2.x by reverting the
>>>> backports (which seems to make sense to me given the comments
>>>> in r473681, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=473681)?
>>>> Or should we backport r447894?
>>>> I am happy to proceed either way with a preference of reverting.
>>> That would be my pref as well...
>> +1.  I raised an objection when this first went in that changing the
>> "contract" was iffy.  Our entire versioning rules were based on the
>> fact that once you have a specific major, minimum .minor - that's it.
>> Your app is safe.
>>
>> It's a nice idea in 1.3, but since it's causing issues, simply revert.
> 
> Done in r565517.

Wasn't the (*new)->remote_addr_unknown = 0; causing the problem?

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

> 
> Regards
> 
> RĂ¼diger
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message