apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Roll 0.9.15 this week?
Date Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:03:27 GMT


On 08/13/2007 09:34 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> On Aug 13, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>> On 08/13/2007 07:38 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>>> Jim's spearheaded an effort to release httpd-2.0.60 and we've
>>>> discovered a set of socket issues that need to be corrected by
>>>> apr-0.9.15.
>>> How do we plan to address these? Like in 1.2.x by reverting the
>>> backports (which seems to make sense to me given the comments
>>> in r473681, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=473681)?
>>> Or should we backport r447894?
>>> I am happy to proceed either way with a preference of reverting.
>> That would be my pref as well...
> 
> +1.  I raised an objection when this first went in that changing the
> "contract" was iffy.  Our entire versioning rules were based on the
> fact that once you have a specific major, minimum .minor - that's it.
> Your app is safe.
> 
> It's a nice idea in 1.3, but since it's causing issues, simply revert.

Done in r565517.

Regards

RĂ¼diger


Mime
View raw message