apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Roll 0.9.15 this week?
Date Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:20:18 GMT
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 08/13/2007 09:34 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> On Aug 13, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> >>> On 08/13/2007 07:38 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >>>> Jim's spearheaded an effort to release httpd-2.0.60 and we've
> >>>> discovered a set of socket issues that need to be corrected by
> >>>> apr-0.9.15.
> >>> How do we plan to address these? Like in 1.2.x by reverting the
> >>> backports (which seems to make sense to me given the comments
> >>> in r473681, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=473681)?
> >>> Or should we backport r447894?
> >>> I am happy to proceed either way with a preference of reverting.
> >> That would be my pref as well...
> > 
> > +1.  I raised an objection when this first went in that changing the
> > "contract" was iffy.  Our entire versioning rules were based on the
> > fact that once you have a specific major, minimum .minor - that's it.
> > Your app is safe.
> > 
> > It's a nice idea in 1.3, but since it's causing issues, simply revert.
> 
> Done in r565517.
> 

Perfect...

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
	    "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."

Mime
View raw message