Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 56091 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2007 14:11:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2007 14:11:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 99096 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2007 14:11:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 98713 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2007 14:11:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 98702 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2007 14:11:14 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:11:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.177] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:11:09 -0700 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so2408455waf for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:10:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=HcLVOUfyzF9GF7KizXBCPKUFfFUsBwMwLlBVMudAjoJ/jeqofDu7ifSrxztW9viT04jFgCe6rOQqcF7DjzhLhSy7qANvBJugxIgR4ajvjb+dSPAV6gmkfeq3fwwVDbz4NV+tZAecEdAx8G8YoCZBNP7jpyTTgQUo3re1bPof2Vs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=aj6E/fBpC/2SMrzqx5/7FXwsOZOKGXafRv7bAC+XlE64bKR3OpP9ZXlqasQyBIPt+dA+X/qeT9u95lfkkTM+GQ3ezXeeRZ0KqobiM/JopzGUAOPtVw3zUcrq9a3HbPR98TqsUdwO4fmqzZphvWBnixno4dS+4I/D4C2UnHjdbA4= Received: by 10.114.198.1 with SMTP id v1mr446205waf.1184681448468; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.196.8 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5c902b9e0707170710k62b5de43lf142200f22c884a4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:10:48 +0200 From: "Justin Erenkrantz" Sender: justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com To: "Davi Arnaut" Subject: Re: apr_pools hairsplitting Cc: "APR Developer List" In-Reply-To: <469CC8E0.9010409@haxent.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4695288A.6020400@haxent.com.br> <20070717121814.GA2587@redhat.com> <469CC8E0.9010409@haxent.com.br> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2b9ac546452fc298 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 7/17/07, Davi Arnaut wrote: > > Have you looked at where the text size reduction comes from? Fewer > > static functions being inlined? > > mostly from the uninline of allocator_alloc and allocator_free. Since a lot of performance tuning was done on the allocator and pools, does this change and, in particular, removing the inlining, have any noticeable impact on our downstream apps - such as httpd or SVN? Thanks. -- justin