Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 64843 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2007 05:17:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2007 05:17:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 18913 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2007 05:17:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 18534 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2007 05:17:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 18521 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2007 05:17:37 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:17:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of bojan@rexursive.com designates 203.171.74.242 as permitted sender) Received: from [203.171.74.242] (HELO beauty.rexursive.com) (203.171.74.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:17:34 -0700 Received: from [172.27.0.24] (shrek.rexursive.com [172.27.0.24]) by beauty.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 416B040B03 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:17:12 +1000 (EST) Subject: Docs: platform definitions From: Bojan Smojver To: APR Development List Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:17:12 +1000 Message-Id: <1184735832.17393.11.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-1.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Regarding this documentation: http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr/1.2/group__apr__platform.html Does the list think it would be appropriate to add a comment at the top of the page explaining that the implementation specific values defined here should not be relied upon? The page reflects implementation values of whichever platform documentation was generated on, not of the APR against which the user may link the apps. For instance, on a mixed architecture Linux machines, docs may be generated with x86_64 defaults and user could be linking against i386 binaries. -- Bojan