Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 32499 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2007 22:10:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jun 2007 22:10:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 52840 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2007 22:10:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 52785 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2007 22:10:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 52774 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2007 22:10:55 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:10:55 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.227] (HELO smtpout06.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:10:51 -0700 Received: (qmail 29854 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2007 22:10:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (24.15.193.17) by smtpout06-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.227) with ESMTP; 06 Jun 2007 22:10:29 -0000 Message-ID: <466730D3.60301@rowe-clan.net> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:10:27 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruediger Pluem CC: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: [Vote] Release APR 1.2.9/0.9.14 and apr-iconv 1.2.0 References: <46649707.6010808@rowe-clan.net> <4d45da050706051709xcb3c061gfe56c73223a24ffc@mail.gmail.com> <466650B1.4060203@rowe-clan.net> <4d45da050706060140v73014bdr9784afab278526bd@mail.gmail.com> <4d45da050706060439n45645cbexd5aaf6389df6ceb8@mail.gmail.com> <4d45da050706060806u645e636q4124f1d0c02cfbea@mail.gmail.com> <20070606185610.GA18044@redhat.com> <466706A3.6000002@haxent.com.br> <4d45da050706061257ueb6940ka4553a5f83bfd156@mail.gmail.com> <4d45da050706061424g3191d82fo143c6a168d513bcf@mail.gmail.com> <46672B07.1040008@rowe-clan.net> <46672F17.6030001@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <46672F17.6030001@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > On 06/06/2007 11:45 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >> I'm quite partial to your third solution, I trust from performance that >> this is the greatest net efficiency (but per platform tests would be needed >> to confirm this). This is worth dumping 1.2.9 and rerolling 1.2.10 IMHO >> (along with other small fixes that are identified today or tomorrow morning.) > > I know, that I am late with this, but how about backporting the patch for PR28205 > (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28205)? > > Additionally to my remarks in #12 I also checked it now on RHAS4 64 bit without > any hasle. IIUC - this patch does NOT add -L/path at all for /usr/lib, /usr/lib64, if the compiler resolves the -lexpat, correct? If so, amen! Be my guest to get this committed and get our fingers our of the compiler's business.