From dev-return-18392-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Sat May 12 04:45:49 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31268 invoked from network); 12 May 2007 04:45:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 May 2007 04:45:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 86185 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2007 04:45:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 85805 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2007 04:45:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 85794 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2007 04:45:53 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 May 2007 21:45:53 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of bojan@rexursive.com designates 203.171.74.242 as permitted sender) Received: from [203.171.74.242] (HELO beauty.rexursive.com) (203.171.74.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 May 2007 21:45:46 -0700 Received: from [172.27.0.24] (shrek.rexursive.com [172.27.0.24]) by beauty.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30D14038E; Sat, 12 May 2007 14:45:24 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: Time to revisit 1.2.9 flavors From: Bojan Smojver To: lucian.grijincu@gmail.com Cc: "William A. Rowe, Jr." , dev@apr.apache.org In-Reply-To: <1178931669.29406.75.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> References: <46321AEE.4080300@rowe-clan.net> <1177714964.3178.1.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <1178862821.29406.71.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <4d45da050705110220n638dc7b5w264cff3bd390b392@mail.gmail.com> <1178931669.29406.75.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 14:45:24 +1000 Message-Id: <1178945124.29406.100.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-2.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 11:01 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote: > I think the current behaviour is a bug and we should change it. From my > POV, it doesn't make sense to expect that a piece of data that's written > to a file would end up in it twice in buffered mode and only once in > non-buffered mode Also a related issue here - Win32 and OS2 will behave differently at present, given that they don't fork. So, we're already inconsistent across platforms. Just another reason to fix this. -- Bojan