From dev-return-18230-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Wed Mar 28 15:48:09 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 7018 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2007 15:48:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2007 15:48:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 11987 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2007 15:48:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 11730 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2007 15:48:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 11718 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2007 15:48:14 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:48:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of jorton@redhat.com designates 66.187.233.31 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.187.233.31] (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:48:04 -0700 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l2SFlhLd006546 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:47:43 -0400 Received: from radish.cambridge.redhat.com (radish.cambridge.redhat.com [172.16.18.90]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l2SFlgwj019573 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:47:42 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=radish.cambridge.redhat.com) by radish.cambridge.redhat.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HWaNB-0000hP-HA for dev@apr.apache.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:47:41 +0100 Received: (from jorton@localhost) by radish.cambridge.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l2SFles9002690 for dev@apr.apache.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:47:40 +0100 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:47:40 +0100 From: Joe Orton To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: future of ssl code Message-ID: <20070328154740.GA2272@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: dev@apr.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <460A8537.7050509@rowe-clan.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David Owens (Ireland) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:09:43AM -0500, William Rowe wrote: > > Given Joe's stance (which I'm taking as a veto) I think removing it and > > starting a seperate "module" within apr's repo would make the most sense > > and should remove the veto from 1.3 - making everyone happy. > > I definately don't want to see this handled piecemeal. Please leave it in > place, and Joe please reconsider your veto. I have not vetoed anything. In principle I have no objection to putting the SSL code in apr-util. As I said originally: I would prefer to see the code develop in a branch until it reaches a suitable state for inclusion in the trunk/a release. joe