apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: Generic errors
Date Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:33:40 GMT
David Reid wrote:
> When this happens the function return APR_EGENERIC which means that the
> user knows a problem happens, that it was related to a subsystem and
> that there is more information available. They would then call another
> function to get the error structure. This could then be used to generate
> an error string via apr.

Offhand; this doesn't sound terribly thread safe nor reentrant.

Does it make more sense for more complex functions to return a richer
result?  Or how are you thinking of associating the error with the
additional information in a reentrant manner?

View raw message