apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: future of ssl code
Date Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:04:32 GMT
Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:09:43AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
>>> Given Joe's stance (which I'm taking as a veto) I think removing it and
>>> starting a seperate "module" within apr's repo would make the most sense
>>> and should remove the veto from 1.3 - making everyone happy.
>> I definately don't want to see this handled piecemeal.  Please leave it in
>> place, and Joe please reconsider your veto.
> 
> I have not vetoed anything.  In principle I have no objection to putting 
> the SSL code in apr-util.  As I said originally: I would prefer to see 
> the code develop in a branch until it reaches a suitable state for 
> inclusion in the trunk/a release.

If 1.3 looked immanent, I'd agree.  Since we have a bit of time, it seems
we could leave development on trunk for a time till we are satisfied that
progress is being made, or shift it to a branch if there's a strong desire
to ship out a 1.3.0.  Sensible?

Mime
View raw message