apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Reid <da...@jetnet.co.uk>
Subject Re: future of ssl code
Date Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:00:14 GMT
Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:09:43AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
>>> Given Joe's stance (which I'm taking as a veto) I think removing it and
>>> starting a seperate "module" within apr's repo would make the most sense
>>> and should remove the veto from 1.3 - making everyone happy.
>> I definately don't want to see this handled piecemeal.  Please leave it in
>> place, and Joe please reconsider your veto.
> I have not vetoed anything.  In principle I have no objection to putting 
> the SSL code in apr-util.  As I said originally: I would prefer to see 
> the code develop in a branch until it reaches a suitable state for 
> inclusion in the trunk/a release.

I assume my suggestion to remove the code into a separate module would
also satisfy you?

View raw message