Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45261 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2007 18:54:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2007 18:54:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 40645 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2007 18:54:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 40600 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2007 18:54:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 40589 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2007 18:54:27 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:54:27 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.155.252.72] (HELO thunderer.cnchost.com) (207.155.252.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:54:17 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (unknown [24.15.193.17]) (as wrowe@rowe-clan.net) by thunderer.cnchost.com (ConcentricHost(2.54) Relay) with ESMTP id E86C423F5 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:53:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45C3888A.3090500@rowe-clan.net> Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:52:58 -0600 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: svn move apr/dist/trunk/ to apr/site/trunk/dist/ ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I recently relocated httpd/httpd/dist to httpd/site/trunk/dist/, which works out well and I'd like to propose the same, here. apr/site/trunk/ now contains xdocs/ and docs/ of the source and generated site. Locating dist/ within the same root wouldn't pose any conflicts because of the scheme. But it makes it simpler to search the tree for stale published references and simplifies the release process. Any objections to this move? Bill