On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:19:07 +0000
david reid <david@jetnet.co.uk> wrote:
[aaargh! You copied me, and I just hit reply when
it should've gone to the list. I prefer just the
one copy of your mail, which should be the one
arriving from the list]
> Actually I think wrowe had an interesting point - if we get this right
> is there a reason for apr-util anymore? Removing the divide may well
> make things easier and would reduce our development overhead.
>
Agreed. I was kind-of taking it as implicit that the distinction,
insofar as it lives on, is between a core library (libapr) with
minimal or no dependencies, and a bunch of dynamically loadable
modules corresponding broadly to the current apr-util.
--
Nick Kew
Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book
http://www.apachetutor.org/
--
Nick Kew
Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book
http://www.apachetutor.org/
|