Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65325 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2007 15:41:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2007 15:41:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 4183 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2007 15:41:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 4073 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2007 15:41:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 4062 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2007 15:41:09 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jagunet.com) (209.133.199.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:41:07 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jagunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E75447FD0; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:40:11 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <23678.196.8.104.31.1169652035.squirrel@www.sharp.fm> References: <23678.196.8.104.31.1169652035.squirrel@www.sharp.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <67534386-0E0D-4C02-851B-760624A8C968@jaguNET.com> Cc: dev@apr.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Jagielski Subject: Re: Terms for bucket types Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:40:10 -0500 To: Graham Leggett X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > Hi all, > > APR contains support for buckets represented by physical memory > (HEAP and > IMMORTAL), as well as "virtual" buckets that consume virtually no > memory > themselves, but that represent possibly large blocks of data (FILE). > > Is there a term used within APR to categorize buckets of these two > types? > > Would "physical" buckets and "virtual" buckets make sense? > As good as any :)