apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Optimized MD5 implementation from OpenSSL
Date Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:24:52 GMT
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 1/3/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> > We've long talked about merging APR and APR-util into one library
>> for 2.0.
>> Pointers?!?
> Here on the list and at every hackathon/ApacheCon for the last few years.

Searching body text of the history for 'merge apr' or 'combine apr' yields
no results, pointer please.  Undocumented hackathon discussions are not
valid citations.

>> Now - I thought the public discussion lists were moving twords disolving
>> APR-util into smaller libraries, dependent on specific features that
>> wouldn't swallow the entire world of unnecessary library functionality
>> into every runtime?
> That's part of the discussions that have been here on list, but
> frankly, I've never seen anyone say how a dynamic APR would work
> reliably.  In fact, I think the eventual consensus was that
> splitting-off approach could never work at all.

Where is that documented?

Please don't start a thread on "Our agreed way to ..." when in fact there's
no documented technical discussion, and start a fresh thread to attempt to
argue that svn or log4cxx really needs to load libldap/liblber.

View raw message