apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Samuelson <pe...@p12n.org>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Linux 2.4 may or may not implement sendfile64()
Date Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:07:18 GMT

[Joe Orton]
> OK nice.  Why does this require run-time detection rather than simply
> a smarter configure test (or apr_hints.m4 blacklist or whatever)?

Because we (Debian) ship binaries rather than source code.  Our users
run these binaries on both kernel 2.4 and kernel 2.6.  Without runtime
detection you get two bad choices.  Take your pick:

- Users still on kernel 2.4 can't run Apache at all - or
- Users on kernel 2.6 can't use Apache to serve 2+GB files

Runtime detection allows everyone to run Apache, and the majority
(people using kernel 2.6, or kernel 2.4.21+ on i386) can also serve
large files.

...And before you say "just make all Debian users upgrade their
kernels", that's not realistic.  Datacenters that sell shell accounts
on vservers, for example, often let you control the whole system
_except_ what kernel it runs.


Btw, use of the Linux epoll facility is similar (another kernel 2.4/2.6
difference), except that if you unconditionally disable it, no actual
functionality is lost, only a bit of efficiency.  So we disabled epoll.

Mime
View raw message