Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 23:20:33 -0500
From: Bob Rossi <bob_rossi@cox.net>
To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
Cc: John Vandenberg <jayvdb@gmail.com>, dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: building apr on cygwin for mingw
Message-ID: <20061206042033.GG12869@cox.net>
Mail-Followup-To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>,
	John Vandenberg <jayvdb@gmail.com>, dev@apr.apache.org
References: <20061202031039.GB27385@cox.net>
 <deea21830612041516pc5cd9e8wf3d93190a17175df@mail.gmail.com>
 <20061205195353.GT30254@cox.net> <4575DCAD.7010902@rowe-clan.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4575DCAD.7010902@rowe-clan.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14

On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 02:55:09PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Failed Tests   		Total	Fail	Failed %
> > ===================================================
> > testdso        		    5	   4	 80.00%
> > testpipe       		    9	   2	 22.22%
> 
> testpipe errors are expected.  Filesystem pipes on windows do not behave
> in a socket-compatible, select()able manner.
> 
> testdso is another story - perhaps it believes it's using the dlxxx flavor
> instead of windows, and some common code it causing it to throw up?

When I compile apr nativly, with mingw, I get the same test results.

Failed Tests            Total   Fail    Failed %
===================================================
testdso                     5      4     80.00%
testpipe                    9      2     22.22%
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/kelli/apr/apr/test'

Is this a regression in apr svn trunk?

Also, if I used cl to compile apr, would that make more tests pass? For
example, does cl somehow have more capabilities on windows than mingw?

Thanks,
Bob Rossi