From dev-return-17757-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Fri Dec 22 21:51:19 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2344 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2006 21:51:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Dec 2006 21:51:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 26035 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2006 21:51:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 25992 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2006 21:51:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 25981 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2006 21:51:25 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:51:25 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of bojan@rexursive.com designates 203.171.74.242 as permitted sender) Received: from [203.171.74.242] (HELO beauty.rexursive.com) (203.171.74.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:51:15 -0800 Received: from [172.27.0.24] (shrek.rexursive.com [172.27.0.24]) by beauty.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58DE1AFC60 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 08:50:53 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: Outdated documentation on http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr/ From: Bojan Smojver To: APR Development List In-Reply-To: <1166821944.2947.6.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> References: <458BD2E8.6000202@avira.com> <1166821944.2947.6.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 08:50:53 +1100 Message-Id: <1166824253.2947.11.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 (2.8.2.1-2.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 08:12 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: > Actually, we should probably have documentation for all release versions > currently available and maybe even the the trunk. Similar to what httpd > folks do. More importantly, would there be objections if I made that change to APR web site? -- Bojan