apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Salikh Zakirov <Salikh.Zaki...@Intel.com>
Subject Re: apr_thread_cond_signal() lost?
Date Tue, 26 Dec 2006 13:42:59 GMT
Salikh Zakirov wrote:
> the current implementation of apr_thread_cond_signal() on Windows
> has a deficiency: it may lose several concurrent or sequential
> signal() calls if more than one thread is waiting on a condition
> variable, because there is no count of the number of signal() calls,
> and only one woken up thread will really come out of the loop.
> ...

I've submitted APR bug 41243 to track this issue.


Mime
View raw message