Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 32174 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2006 20:16:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Nov 2006 20:16:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 1919 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2006 20:16:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 1881 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2006 20:16:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 1856 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2006 20:16:41 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:16:41 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.155.252.14] (HELO wellington.cnchost.com) (207.155.252.14) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:16:26 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (c-24-15-193-17.hsd1.il.comcast.net [24.15.193.17]) (as wrowe@rowe-clan.net) by wellington.cnchost.com (ConcentricHost(2.54) Relay) with ESMTP id 521668130D; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:16:05 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45523B03.70206@rowe-clan.net> Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:16:03 -0600 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060913) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Querna CC: dev@apr.apache.org, dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.8, was Re: Time for 2.2.4? References: <49E6F580-24BD-4AA4-849C-63A00DCA160B@jaguNET.com> <4552166A.401@force-elite.com> In-Reply-To: <4552166A.401@force-elite.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Scroll back a half hour :) Seriously - do folks need the extra day - or does anyone object to Friday midday? Paul Querna wrote: > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should >> start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments? >> I offer to be RM. > > I think we should start thinking about it too. I think we should also > consider requesting that APR{,-Util} 1.2.8 gets done by the APR > developers... > > With the APR hat on, I volunteer to RM a 1.2.x release of APR and > APR-Util. How does this Saturday as a release cut time sound for everyone? > > -Paul > > > . >