Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:51:01 -0800
From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com>
To: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release apr / apr-util 1.2.8 / 0.9.13
Message-ID: <20061130205100.GC2515@scotch.ics.uci.edu>
Mail-Followup-To: Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com>,
	dev@apr.apache.org
References: <456D7BAC.7060807@rowe-clan.net>
 <5c902b9e0611290840k6b89088fn486a9af71c4d2365@mail.gmail.com>
 <20061130170441.GA19996@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20061130170441.GA19996@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11

On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 05:04:41PM +0000, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 08:40:05AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > APR test failures on Solaris 10, but not enough for me to consider a
> > showstopper for 1.2.8.  Details below.  APR tests passed on Mac OS X.
> > And, APR-util tests passed on both.
> > 
> > Thanks for RMing!  -- justin
> > 
> > Solaris 10/Intel, Sun Studio 11:
> > testlfs             : FAILED 1 of 9 (don't have 8GB free on device)
> > testpoll            : /Line 314: expected <5>, but saw <4>
> >                      FAILED 1 of 13
> > testsockets         : -Line 148: expected <0>, but saw <126>
> >                      hung
> 
> Are these regressions since 1.2.7?  I've not seen any report of testlfs 
> failures on Solaris before AFAIR.  Is this some filesystem which doesn't 
> support sparse files, what's the actual error message?

I am unsure if they are regressions.  But, as I mentioned in ()s about testlfs,
the test for lfs errors out with a message saying that I don't have 8GB free on
the device or that it was out of space.  I was building and testing in /tmp
which is RAM-backed - so I'm going to ignore that failure for now.  -- justin