From dev-return-17536-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Thu Nov 09 16:02:00 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3661 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2006 16:01:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Nov 2006 16:01:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 98526 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2006 16:02:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 98494 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2006 16:02:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 98461 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2006 16:02:08 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 08:02:08 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.192.6] (HELO devsys.jaguNET.com) (209.133.192.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 08:01:54 -0800 Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.13.8/jag-2.6) id kA9G1Um22838; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:01:30 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <200611091601.kA9G1Um22838@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: Time for 2.2.4? To: jorton@redhat.com (Joe Orton) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:01:27 -0500 (EST) Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org, dev@apr.apache.org Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com In-Reply-To: <20061109155313.GB2348@redhat.com> from "Joe Orton" at Nov 09, 2006 03:53:13 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Joe Orton wrote: > > > 2) it's a really bad implementation. You can do the same thing portably > by doing a poll() and a recv(,MSG_PEEK) AFAICT. There is no need to > muck about with ioctls, and it can be done already without adding > anything to APR. > > 2. b) using select() like that will SIGSEGV on Unix for an fd > > FD_SETSIZE. There is no excuse to at least not use apr_poll() > Do I detect the leanings of a potential veto for the impl in httpd-trunk?? -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."