apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Time for 2.2.4?
Date Wed, 08 Nov 2006 20:17:24 GMT

On Nov 8, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Joe Orton wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 12:27:31PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Mladen Turk wrote:
>>>
>>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>> Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
>>>> start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
>>>
>>> I would like to propose the backport of proxy alternate
>>> is_socket_connected. This is IMHO very crucial
>>> for AJP to work. Without that the loadbalancer is
>>> unusable for most platforms.
>>>
>>
>> I know that Bill is looking at a release of APR and
>> that alternate method would, I think, be better
>> implemented in APR than directly in httpd...
>
> Eww, no thanks.  AFAIK the same results can be achieved using existing
> APR interfaces: a non-blocking apr_socket_recv() passing the MSG_PEEK
> flag, as I mentioned this on dev@apr already.
>

I was referring to an APR apr_is_socket_connected()
function. Seems to me that it's a common enough
network "test" that providing it directly with an
APR call is niceness.


Mime
View raw message