apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release apr / apr-util 1.2.8 / 0.9.13
Date Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:56:54 GMT
So given there are room for improvement but most of these appear to be
situational and OS specific (heck - BSD 6.1 fails yet OS/X is golden?  Odd)
I'm comfortable running with this.  My own results later today, we look
good for blessing this on Friday.


Sander Temme wrote:
> 
> On Nov 30, 2006, at 12:51 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 05:04:41PM +0000, Joe Orton wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 08:40:05AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>>>> APR test failures on Solaris 10, but not enough for me to consider a
>>>> showstopper for 1.2.8.  Details below.  APR tests passed on Mac OS X.
>>>> And, APR-util tests passed on both.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for RMing!  -- justin
>>>>
>>>> Solaris 10/Intel, Sun Studio 11:
>>>> testlfs             : FAILED 1 of 9 (don't have 8GB free on device)
>>>> testpoll            : /Line 314: expected <5>, but saw <4>
>>>>                      FAILED 1 of 13
>>>> testsockets         : -Line 148: expected <0>, but saw <126>
>>>>                      hung
>>>
>>> Are these regressions since 1.2.7?  I've not seen any report of testlfs
>>> failures on Solaris before AFAIR.  Is this some filesystem which doesn't
>>> support sparse files, what's the actual error message?
>>
>> I am unsure if they are regressions.  But, as I mentioned in ()s about
>> testlfs,
>> the test for lfs errors out with a message saying that I don't have
>> 8GB free on
>> the device or that it was out of space.  I was building and testing in
>> /tmp
>> which is RAM-backed - so I'm going to ignore that failure for now.  --
>> justin
> 
> I just tried 1.2.8 on my Solaris 10 VMWare instance, and testlfs passes
> without complaints. And no way that instance has 8Gb available. (:
> 
> 1.2.7:
> Failed Tests            Total   Fail    Failed %
> ===================================================
> testpoll                   13      1      7.69%
> 
> 1.2.8:
> Failed Tests            Total   Fail    Failed %
> ===================================================
> testpoll                   13      1      7.69%
> 
> So, no regression.
> 
> However, if I build and test from a source tree in /tmp, like you,
> testlfs fails for me even more verbosely than for you:
> 
> sctemme@solaris10:/tmp/apr-1.2.8/test$./testall -v testlfs
> testlfs             : |Line 79: truncate file to 8gb (28): No space left
> on device
>                                                                       
>                                                                       
>                                                             -Line 90:
> Large file tests not
> enabled                                                                
>                                                                       
>                              /Line 108: Large file tests not
> enabled                                                                
>                                                                       
>                             |Line 121: Large file tests not
> enabled                                                                
>                                                                       
>                             -Line 176: Large file tests not
> enabled                                                                
>                                                                       
>                             /Line 153: Large file tests not
> enabled                                                                
>                                                                       
>                             |Line 203: Large file tests not
> enabled                                                                
>                                                                       
>                             -Line 228: Large file tests not
> enabled                                                                
>                                                                       
>                             /Line 254: Large file tests not
> enabled                                                                
>                                                                       
>                             FAILED 1 of 9
> Failed Tests            Total   Fail    Failed %
> ===================================================
> testlfs                     9      1     11.11%
> 
> So let's chalk that up to an artefact due to the memory backed file system.
> 
> I don't see any issue with testsockets.
> 
> S.
> 
> --sander@temme.net              http://www.temme.net/sander/
> PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4  B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
> 


Mime
View raw message