apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henry Jen <henry...@ztune.net>
Subject Re: Tagging a tarball friday, 1.2.x, perhaps 0.9.x
Date Thu, 09 Nov 2006 04:51:03 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I'm primarilly interested in making a 1.2 tarball to vote on in 48
> hours because we have fixed a number of bugs.  Although there are
> still a few more in-queue (and I welcome all help to get these fixed
> in the branch), I'm mostly thinking that a bugfix stable release would
> be good - before I commit any code to support 'new things' in HFS (OS/X),
> that might introduce new breakage or build oddities for a subset of
> the users.
> 
> I can roll 0.9 at the same time, if there is sufficient interest.  But
> wouldn't mind 'skipping' a cycle or two - and focusing on the bug cleanups
> added for 1.2 - in preparation for 1.3.0.
> 

Bug 40892 for libexpat detection and 40893 for apr_brigade_length were 
recently filed but had been proposed and discussed on apr@dev for some time.

IIRC, questions to those patches are explained, is there any other 
concern for those 2 relative small patches?

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40892
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40893

Cheers,
Henry

Mime
View raw message