Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82265 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2006 14:37:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Sep 2006 14:37:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 17114 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2006 14:37:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 17065 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2006 14:37:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 17051 invoked by uid 99); 27 Sep 2006 14:37:15 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:37:15 -0700 Authentication-Results: idunn.apache.osuosl.org header.from=rooneg@gmail.com; domainkeys=good Authentication-Results: idunn.apache.osuosl.org smtp.mail=rooneg@gmail.com; spf=pass X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE Received-SPF: pass (idunn.apache.osuosl.org: domain gmail.com designates 66.249.82.229 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: good X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 Received: from [66.249.82.229] ([66.249.82.229:25303] helo=wx-out-0506.google.com) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 67/C0-27564-69C8A154 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:37:12 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so223191wxd for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:37:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Y6Qv/7QPIRMh+4sdwVuqYHRSwTUVZSt+MI0bijPTlUnITD7c4eB9eT4TUmZLeYjPhFqUShfAUW9PckKipw/eUnaFsHLQu9pOtgJbiqoTtgqQaO2lj48N+kHSbh265wroFGvplwXjL1ksa5PKrzr6L9cpE4/7oaXctY0VToMqf4g= Received: by 10.70.92.12 with SMTP id p12mr800689wxb; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:37:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.71.8 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:37:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7edfeeef0609270737qd8b463ao4d709297f3f20b74@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:37:08 -0400 From: "Garrett Rooney" Sender: rooneg@gmail.com To: "Cliff Schmidt" Subject: Re: [PATCH] apr_threadpool Cc: "William A. Rowe, Jr." , "Henry Jen" , "APR Development List" , "Sam Ruby" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44EB6E02.1020802@ztune.net> <4500FEB8.4080108@rowe-clan.net> <4519B1F4.5040408@ztune.net> <4519C336.5000205@rowe-clan.net> <4519C821.2020204@rowe-clan.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 29962d787df9cd8a X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 9/27/06, Cliff Schmidt wrote: > Maybe I'm missing some context, but I don't see what the problem is > with allowing a contributor to have their copyright notice placed in > the NOTICE file. I'm familiar with the history behind the BSD > advertising clause issue, but that was not about copyright notices. > What am I missing? Why should this contribution be different than every other new feature we've added over the past N years the project has been around? For all of those a note in the CHANGES and commit log that this was contributed by J. Random Hacker was sufficient. I'm just not thrilled with the idea of having to make a note in the NOTICE file for every single company that sends us a patch that implements new functionality. It's not like this is external code we sought out and added to the tree, this was developed with feedback from other APR developers on our mailing lists. -garrett