Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41168 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2006 17:07:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Sep 2006 17:07:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 22425 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2006 17:07:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 22052 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2006 17:07:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 22041 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2006 17:07:22 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:07:22 -0700 Authentication-Results: idunn.apache.osuosl.org smtp.mail=wrowe@rowe-clan.net; spf=permerror X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= Received-SPF: error (idunn.apache.osuosl.org: domain rowe-clan.net from 207.155.252.219 cause and error) Received: from ([207.155.252.219:34439] helo=warrior.cnchost.com) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1 r(10620)) with ESMTP id 33/20-08684-643A1054 for ; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:07:20 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (c-24-15-193-17.hsd1.il.comcast.net [24.15.193.17]) (as wrowe@rowe-clan.net) by warrior.cnchost.com (ConcentricHost(2.54) Relay) with ESMTP id 2F5991BC7 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 13:07:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4501A334.2040405@rowe-clan.net> Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:07:00 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060808) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: Interest in a release? References: <4500F870.8040002@rowe-clan.net> <20060908125925.GA22880@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20060908125925.GA22880@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Joe Orton wrote: > > The testnames tests are still failing on Unixes after your changes > there, I haven't had time to chase that up. Presuming that is harmless > everything else should be good on 1.2.x. Looks like I never committed > the license header changes to 0.9.x, hum. > > testnames : Line 103: expected <../../..>, but saw <../../../> The patch to examine is here; http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=424915 but not all of it is necessary if the ../../../ pattern returns ../../../ today on Unix. (On win32, it was collapsed into a single ../).