apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Brian Havard" <bri...@kheldar.apana.org.au>
Subject Re: OS2 or Netware folks around?
Date Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:24:56 GMT
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 02:48:48 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

>We should verify this is or is not a problem on these platforms, but I have
>no way to verify.  They both should have profited from my earlier efforts
>since both platforms include ../win32/filepath.c - but only running ./testall
>on those two platforms will confirm for certain.

testnames succeeds on OS/2 with the current apr trunk for me.

>Joe Orton wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:58:24PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
>>> I've committed several bugfix changes to path handling for win32, and some
>>> other issues are also resolved.  The APR_CHECK_FILE must die as well, since
>>> it may be at the root of many user reports of pthread-related synchronization
>>> and daemon control flukes on Solaris.
>>> Thinking of rolling 0.9/1.2 about next Friday, if that motivates anyone to
>>> mop up any other lose ends.
>> The testnames tests are still failing on Unixes after your changes 
>> there, I haven't had time to chase that up.  Presuming that is harmless 
>> everything else should be good on 1.2.x.  Looks like I never committed 
>> the license header changes to 0.9.x, hum.
>> testnames           :  Line 103: expected <../../..>, but saw <../../../>
>> FAILED 1 of 14

 |  Brian Havard                 |  "He is not the messiah!                   |
 |  brianh@kheldar.apana.org.au  |  He's a very naughty boy!" - Life of Brian |

View raw message