apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Brad Nicholes" <BNICHO...@novell.com>
Subject Re: OS2 or Netware folks around?
Date Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:30:02 GMT
>>> On 9/21/2006 at 1:48 AM, in message <451243E0.2060501@rowe-clan.net>, "William
A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> We should verify this is or is not a problem on these platforms, but I have
> no way to verify.  They both should have profited from my earlier efforts
> since both platforms include ../win32/filepath.c - but only running 
> ./testall
> on those two platforms will confirm for certain.
> Joe Orton wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:58:24PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
>>> I've committed several bugfix changes to path handling for win32, and some
>>> other issues are also resolved.  The APR_CHECK_FILE must die as well, since
>>> it may be at the root of many user reports of pthread-related 
> synchronization
>>> and daemon control flukes on Solaris.
>>> Thinking of rolling 0.9/1.2 about next Friday, if that motivates anyone to
>>> mop up any other lose ends.
>> The testnames tests are still failing on Unixes after your changes 
>> there, I haven't had time to chase that up.  Presuming that is harmless 
>> everything else should be good on 1.2.x.  Looks like I never committed 
>> the license header changes to 0.9.x, hum.
>> testnames           :  Line 103: expected <../../..>, but saw <../../../>
>> FAILED 1 of 1

The test that you are referring to works fine on NetWare.  But I had fix another test that
wasn't handling the NetWare variable length volume names.


View raw message