apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: APR_CHECK_FILE considered harmful
Date Fri, 01 Sep 2006 06:47:03 GMT
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:30:14PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
> It occurs to me WHY did we use APR_CHECK_FILE() instead of AC_CHECK_FILE()?
> What does it buy us?
> 
> I'd rather just chuck crufty macros rather than 'fix' them, when it's
> sufficiently covered already by autoconf.

Seems reasonable, I don't know of any reason why AC_CHECK_FILE isn't 
used instead.  It is present back to autoconf 2.13 so this is not a 
problem for APR 0.9.

Regards,

joe

Mime
View raw message