From dev-return-16950-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Thu Jul 20 02:41:42 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15614 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2006 02:41:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2006 02:41:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 78126 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2006 02:41:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 77778 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2006 02:41:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 77767 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2006 02:41:40 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:41:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of david@jetnet.co.uk designates 80.87.128.128 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.87.128.128] (HELO kosh.jetnet.co.uk) (80.87.128.128) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:41:39 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kosh.jetnet.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1495023F97; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:41:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kosh.jetnet.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.jetnet.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20373-06; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:41:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (unknown [216.48.57.109]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kosh.jetnet.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2FC210F0; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:41:17 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <44BEED48.5030708@jetnet.co.uk> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 03:41:12 +0100 From: david reid User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Kew CC: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: rdf store? References: <44BE3B4E.4000602@jetnet.co.uk> <200607191659.46062.nick@webthing.com> In-Reply-To: <200607191659.46062.nick@webthing.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jetnet.co.uk X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nick Kew wrote: > On Wednesday 19 July 2006 15:01, david reid wrote: >> I'm starting to look at adding a mod_sparql to httpd, > > Nice! > >> but on thing that >> will likely be needed is a "store" for RDF files. I suppose adding this >> functionality to apr-util makes the most sense. The redland libraries >> look like a reasonable base for the functionality (they work on most >> os's including windows). > > Redland is a big dependency to add to apr-util. It feels like a good > incentive to switch apr-util to a collection of loadable modules. It is. But making it "optional" (which is what I was planning) wouldn't be out of line with other dependencies we use. FWIW I'm in email contact with one of the key people behind the redland initiative. I'll see where it goes :-) > OK, in terms of APR management, redland could be introduced > in 1.x, while a modularised build would probably imply 2.0. > So I won't push for it as a prerequisite to RDF. But I hope > you'll bear it in mind in designing apr_rdf. Well, why would it make any difference? I realise you're very keen for the changes in the way the we load dependencies, but that's for the future and I'm presently -0 on the whole idea. -- david http://feathercast.org/