apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Garrett Rooney" <roo...@electricjellyfish.net>
Subject Re: current dbd initiatives
Date Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:16:46 GMT
On 6/8/06, Bojan Smojver <bojan@rexursive.com> wrote:
> Quoting Chris Darroch <chrisd@pearsoncmg.com>:
> > 3) Error reporting via a standard set of APR_DBD_* error codes
> Switching to APR_DBD_* error codes will *probably* break binary
> compatibility requirements for 1.x (i.e. int will become apr_status_t,
> which is probably the same thing, but I'm not sure if we're allowed to
> assume that). So, this would most likely be a 2.0 thing. Some long
> term APR folks may have more input on this...

You can assume it's the same.  apr_status_t is unconditionally
typedefed to int in all versions of APR.


View raw message