apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From david reid <da...@jetnet.co.uk>
Subject Re: io abstractions
Date Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:05:05 GMT
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 6/28/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> The only problem I have with an apr_write, is that it's way to easy to 
>> mis-use
>> apr_write when you ment to use apr_ssl_write explicitly, or 
>> apr_registry_write,
>> or any thousands of other applications.

Hmm, either I haven't explained myself properly or you don't get it.

>> _write, _read are methods, so they should be decorated with an 
>> object.  Typing
>> _io really doesn't take that long for the coder using our iol 
>> abstration, no?

BTW, please stop referring to it as iol abstraction - it's not iol - 
it's plain old io. iol implies other aspects for me and while I think 
they're cool they'd live on top of this layer.

> +1.  -- justin


View raw message