apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Kew <n...@webthing.com>
Subject Re: current dbd initiatives
Date Thu, 08 Jun 2006 08:38:12 GMT
On Thursday 08 June 2006 09:20, Nick Kew wrote:

> It seems to me that the current practice is perfectly consistent with other
> parts of apr_util.  Let's just review the apr-util headers for all modules
> containing functions names having a noun and a verb in:
>
> [chop lists]

> In both camps:
> 	apr_ldap_url
> 	apr_memcache
> 	apr_xml

Of course, apr_dbd itself is in fact in both camps, because it uses
noun_verb for its transaction functions.

Anyway, I think the point is made that there isn't a consistent
standard to follow.  To introduce one now - even as a 2.0 thing -
would be far too disruptive to make sense.


-- 
Nick Kew

Mime
View raw message