From dev-return-15906-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Mon Apr 03 19:06:19 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 78791 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2006 19:06:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2006 19:06:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 94750 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2006 19:06:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 94703 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2006 19:06:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 94682 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2006 19:06:13 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 12:06:13 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [207.155.252.47] (HELO goliath.cnchost.com) (207.155.252.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 12:06:12 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (c-24-13-128-132.hsd1.il.comcast.net [24.13.128.132]) by goliath.cnchost.com id PAA16730; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 15:05:51 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17] Errors-To: Message-ID: <4431720E.1010005@rowe-clan.net> Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 14:05:50 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org CC: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA References: <442ED44F.5080703@force-elite.com> <002b01c655d1$3534dae0$8a28c23e@mother> <000e01c655e6$c469e0b0$8a28c23e@mother> <443166D5.208@rowe-clan.net> <443167A9.7060104@ptc.com> In-Reply-To: <443167A9.7060104@ptc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jess Holle wrote: > So does that mean if one grabs the 2.2.1 tar ball one will not be able > to build on Windows? Correct, but the 2.2.2 tarball will build on windows (with a bumped aprutil). That's why I think the concensus, between borked Win32/Netware and a missing proxy patch, is to reroll and get the 2.2.2 out immediately this week. Oh, my personal vote to the RM's tally is -1 (moving rapidly to 2.2.2). > If so, that's not a very compelling tarball for those needing to support > Windows. > > If 2.2.1 is being labeled as non-GA already then that's quite > appropriate, move on to 2.2.2 as soon as possible. 2.2.1 shouldn't be > labeled as GA if it does not build on Windows "as is", though. 2.2.1 is labeled nothing right now, that's why the thread is [VOTE].