apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: svn commit: r396812 - /apr/apr-util/branches/1.2.x/dbd/apr_dbd_pgsql.c
Date Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:04:47 GMT
Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 07:58 -0700, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> 
>>if you're merging a revision from trunk to a branch (or
>>vice-versa for that matter)
> 
> Just occurred to me - if there is a backport from the trunk to a branch
> that isn't a straight merge (i.e. the patch needs adjusting in order to
> work), do I still comment it as "Merge revision...", or do I comment is
> as "Backport such and such fix from trunk"?

It's nice to comment 'rework commit 395999 from trunk to apply clean.'
It helps to track providence.

Mime
View raw message