Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30332 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2006 22:20:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2006 22:20:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 34661 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2006 22:20:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 34628 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2006 22:20:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 34617 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2006 22:20:47 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:20:47 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [207.155.248.9] (HELO warspite.cnchost.com) (207.155.248.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:20:46 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (c-24-13-128-132.hsd1.il.comcast.net [24.13.128.132]) by warspite.cnchost.com id RAA14116; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:20:13 -0500 (EST) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17] Errors-To: Message-ID: <43FE348F.1080407@rowe-clan.net> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:17:51 -0600 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Havard CC: APR developers Subject: Re: svn commit: r379754 - in /apr/apr/trunk/file_io/os2: readwrite.c seek.c References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Brian Havard wrote: > On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:42:18 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >>Brian, did you intend to go ahead and backport this (or your other OS2 >>efforts) to 1.2.x / 0.9.x? > > Yes, I intend backporting this when I have a few moments to spare. > I'm starting to work my way through the test failures as time permits. I'm > afraid I've let it go a bit so there's a fair bit to do. Afraid I'm in the same boat as you :( I've primarilly up till January been stalled in httpd2.0/apr0.9 without the extra cycles to look forward at the newer code, so I also feel like I'm playing catch-up. Especially the Unix side of things. Unfortuantely, as some folks on list know, I always favor mutliple VPATH build flavors all at once, and couldn't even collect the cycles to start trying this till Jan. Think that I caught most of those so my builds (sans uuid failures on MacOS/X for apr 1) all work now. Bill