apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sander Temme <san...@temme.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] 0.9.9 Release
Date Sat, 04 Feb 2006 19:21:48 GMT

On Jan 29, 2006, at 11:33 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:

>  +1  -1  for release:
>  [X] [ ] apr-0.9.9
>  [ ] [X] apr-util-0.9.9

./testall -v for APR:

Darwin Graymalkin.local 8.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 8.4.0: Tue Jan  3  
18:22:10 PST 2006; root:xnu-792.6.56.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power  
Macintosh powerpc

216 tests run:  215 passed, 1 failed, 0 not implemented.

Failed tests in Poll:
1) pollset_remove: expected <5> but was <4>

Darwin clarus.local 8.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 8.4.0: Tue Jan  3  
18:22:10 PST 2006; root:xnu-792.6.56.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power  
Macintosh powerpc

216 tests run:  214 passed, 2 failed, 0 not implemented.

Failed tests in Poll:
1) recv_1_send_0: Socket 0 not signalled when it should be
2) pollset_remove: expected <5> but was <4>

(This is a dual CPU machine, the above a Powerbook)

SunOS httpd.zones.apache.org 5.10 Generic_118844-08 i86pc i386 i86pc

Failed tests in Directory:
1) test_rmkdir_nocwd: make temp dir (17): File exists


Failed tests in Socket Creation:
1) sendto_receivefrom: expected <0> but was <126>

Not Implemented tests in Socket Options:
1) corkable: TCP isn't corkable not implemented on this platform

(Quad CPU Sun V40Z, 64bit (I hope))

FreeBSD bagheera.sandla.org. 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Thu  
Dec 29 09:36:30 PST 2005     sctemme@bagheera.sandla.org.:/usr/obj/ 
usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386

209 tests run:  207 passed, 0 failed, 2 not implemented.

Not Implemented tests in Thread Locks:
1) threads_not_impl: Threads not implemented on this platform not  
implemented on this platform

Not Implemented tests in Threads:
1) threads_not_impl: Threads not implemented on this platform not  
implemented on this platform

Linux eartha 2.6.12-9-386 #1 Mon Oct 10 13:14:36 BST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux

216 tests run:  216 passed, 0 failed, 0 not implemented.


Re: APR-Util

FWIW I agree with wrowe on the licensing issues with gdbm. Linking  
against GPL code by default is a booby trap for whomever packages the  
library.

Aside, I'm not sure how to run the test suite on apr-util. The  
testall program that gives me so much better results in apr than make  
check, doesn't exist. If I run make check, it dies in testdbm on  
FreeBSD 6.0 and Solaris 10 (only available dbms are SDBM and  
'default'), and seems to hang indefinitely after:

Yes 1219606855000000 Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:40:55 GMT

on Linux and Darwin.

S.

-- 
sander@temme.net              http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4  B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF


Mime
View raw message