apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Kew <n...@webthing.com>
Subject Re: status of memcached code in the trunk
Date Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:33:13 GMT
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 09:16, Mads Toftum wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 12:59:34AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > I would continue to veto any single line containing apr_memcache[...] in
> > httpd
> > so long as there isn't a trivial backend as part of apr-util that users
> > can deploy without obtaining, and installing, a memcached process.
>
> By that reasoning, all ldap auth and mod_dbd should also be vetoed...

... and above all, mod_ssl!

> and how about all dbm (except sdbm)

sdbm exactly meets his requirement, yesno?

However, the issue in httpd is different, because we have a well-established
mechanism for dealing with external and third-party modules.  That sounds
more like when my offer of contributing mod_proxy_html to the core was
declined due to the dependency on libxml2: it has flourished anyway:-)

-- 
Nick Kew

Mime
View raw message