apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mads Toftum <m...@toftum.dk>
Subject Re: status of memcached code in the trunk
Date Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:16:55 GMT
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 12:59:34AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I would continue to veto any single line containing apr_memcache[...] in 
> httpd
> so long as there isn't a trivial backend as part of apr-util that users can
> deploy without obtaining, and installing, a memcached process.
> 
By that reasoning, all ldap auth and mod_dbd should also be vetoed...
and how about all dbm (except sdbm) - or have you already implemented
minimal oracle, postgres and ldap servers in apr-util test/ ? And how
about the distcache interface hacked directly into mod_ssl?

vh

Mads Toftum
-- 
`Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall


Mime
View raw message