apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Curt Arnold <carn...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Gump failures on apr-iconv and apr-util since 2005-11-10
Date Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:04:49 GMT

On Dec 20, 2005, at 5:19 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> Garrett Rooney wrote:
>> So you want gump to build a configuration that virtually no users
>> actually use?  That seems totally useless to me.  Gump should be
>> building and testing the system as it is intended to be used, if this
>> was a win32 build, I'd be all for it testing apr-iconv, but it's a
>> unix build, it should use the support for the platform iconv just  
>> like
>> a normal user would.
>
> Granted all modern Solaris/Linux build iconv into the clib or  
> liconv as
> a system library; however users of older unicies or obscure  
> platforms still
> could certainly require some iconv support.  Once we dump iconv, if  
> we ever
> did, then I'd agree with you.
>
> Bill


It would still be very nice to get that one line fixed in apr-iconv  
since apr-util is a dependency for log4cxx.   As long as apr-util is  
not being built by Gump, neither is log4cxx and it eliminates the  
only continuous integration system that reports our build status to  
our list.

Mime
View raw message