| Message view | « Date » · « Thread » |
|---|---|
| Top | « Date » · « Thread » |
| From | "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> |
| Subject | [POLL] pools, apr 2.x, and beyond |
| Date | Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:08:53 GMT |
This isn't a vote, but a poll to gauge interest of the community.
Moving forward into apr 2.x or beyond, which better espresses your
personal interest?
[ ] Improve (al la apr_prealloc) the pool API, but continue to use
a pool-based schema for apr's resources.
[ ] Add apr_Xalloc/_Xrealloc/_Xfree based on alternate allocation
strategies, allowing support of non-pool based apr resources.
Not binding, but more to gather where we might be moving next.
Bill
| |
| Mime |
|
| View raw message | |