apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: iconv - mistake #27?
Date Mon, 10 Oct 2005 01:12:11 GMT
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> 
> No, I haven't tested it.  -- justin

I was actually looking for votes to 'Hey - keep it!' from some people
who also believed 'I'll even test it!'.

What's most worrying is that we have 2 +1's, but no -1's and no +/- 0,
meaning we have no eyeballs.  That's fine till the end of 1.x, but sure
doesn't bode well for the 2.x apr cycle.

Bill

Mime
View raw message