apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: iconv - mistake #27?
Date Thu, 06 Oct 2005 02:10:59 GMT
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:01:07AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 
>>Well... it's pretty clear iconv has no more eyes than three, and half
>>of those are not project members.
> 
> For what it's worth, I've put in the time to review and test each of the
> proposals you posted, but saw little point in voting. Nevertheless; +1.
> You can decide what weight to afford it ;) (non-PMC, committer-in-limbo,
> so I suspect zero)  

I better clarify - do you mean +1 to axe xlate/iconv, or did you mean
to +1 apr-util 1.1.1?  As a new committer (even if the switches haven't
been thrown yet), certainly your vote makes a difference.

Bill

Mime
View raw message