apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Brad Nicholes" <BNICHO...@novell.com>
Subject Re: iconv - mistake #27?
Date Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:24:55 GMT
   I guess I don't understand what the point of dropping xlate would be.
 We already have httpd modules that depend on it (mod_charset_lite,
mod_auth_ldap).  Are you proposing that we would have to rip the xlate
support from those modules as well?

Brad

>>> On 10/3/2005 at 11:01:07 pm, in message
<43420C93.60602@rowe-clan.net>,
"William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Well... it's pretty clear iconv has no more eyes than three, and
half
> of those are not project members.
> 
> So, guess it's time, I'd propose we VOTE to eliminate apr_xlate, and
> iconv, from apr-util.  Especially considering that the current iconv
> implementations detected are more-likely-than-not GPL code, which
then
> infects APR.
> 
> Please vote
> 
> [ ]  Drop xlate, drop iconv
> [ ]  Retain xlate [implicit - personally -I- will support bsd-iconv]
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill

Mime
View raw message