Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38757 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2005 20:11:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2005 20:11:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 56599 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2005 20:11:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 56567 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2005 20:11:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 56554 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2005 20:11:33 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 13:11:33 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [69.225.174.131] (HELO x.win.covalent.net) (69.225.174.131) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 13:11:45 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.21] ([24.13.128.132]) by x.win.covalent.net over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 7 Sep 2005 13:10:16 -0700 Message-ID: <431F4944.4020801@rowe-clan.net> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:10:44 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= CC: "Roy T. Fielding" , dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r265755 - in /apr/apr-util/trunk/ldap: apr_ldap_init.c apr_ldap_option.c References: <20050901170154.77705.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <6.2.1.2.2.20050901125603.073f82d0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> <431918C9.8040907@xbc.nu> In-Reply-To: <431918C9.8040907@xbc.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Sep 2005 20:10:16.0390 (UTC) FILETIME=[29BC0660:01C5B3E8] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Brane, actually I'm thinking that the pre-NT, post-NT split is a perfect justification for two different builds, and was working on that for the Apache 2.2 installer. Running 9x/NT detection throughout APR just seems silly, when you consider that it's one or the other. Folks upgrading from borked Win9x OS's to NT feel no pain. Folks that downgrade to 9x should be shot on site :) Bill Branko Čibej wrote: > Roy T. Fielding wrote: > >> We have no need to support anything other than the latest updates >> of Win2k and WinXP. Anything other than that should not be running >> a server and can continue using our old builds if needed. > > > *Sigh*, yes, fine, but APR is used by stuff other than httpd, some of > which aren't servers. Subversion's one of them. It doesn't use ldap, but > does use apr_util. > > If the goal of this project is to produce a portable runtime, then it > has to run on less-than-bleeding-edge machines (even if some features > aren't available). If, OTOH, the goal is a portable runtime for httpd, > then perhaps Subversion should reconsider its use of APR... > > (No, I don't think having different flavours of the APR DLLs for > different versions of Windows is acceptable.) > > -- Brane > > > . >