apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko ─îibej <br...@xbc.nu>
Subject Re: svn commit: r265755 - in /apr/apr-util/trunk/ldap: apr_ldap_init.c apr_ldap_option.c
Date Tue, 06 Sep 2005 01:59:39 GMT
Graham Leggett wrote:

> Branko ─îibej wrote:
>> I wish that were true. People use Subversion (client-only, of course) 
>> on Win98. I could hardly believe it myself, but it's a fact.
> Enough people to make it worth worrying about?

IMHO, yes. at least, up to now, we've done our best to make the 
Subversion client do a reasonable job on those systems. APR's been a 
great help here.

Besides, AIUI this is not even about Win9x; NT and Win2k are affected, too.

> I don't think we should be releasing crippled software to work around 
> Microsoft bugs that have Microsoft supported fixes, people should 
> rather apply the fix.

As I said, I don't care if a particular feature of APR (in this case, 
LDAP support) isn't available on older systems. But I find it 
unacceptable that apps linked with APR won't even start on those 
systems, even if they don't use the unsupported features.

> If it's impractical, we can always release a "cut down" version of APR 
> for the benefit of older platforms, marking it clearly as a version 
> supporting the older platforms only.

That would push an IMHO unacceptable packaging burden on dependent 
projects. There's a perfectly good alternative that's used elswhere in 
APR, that is, dynamic binding to OS APIs.

If people feel this is too marginal an issue, then I'd like to see a 
note on apr.apache.org about which versions of which OS APR actually 

-- Brane

View raw message