Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2058 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2005 16:43:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2005 16:43:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 60881 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2005 16:43:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 60767 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2005 16:43:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 60701 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2005 16:43:19 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 09:43:19 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.68.5.17] (HELO relay03.pair.com) (209.68.5.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 09:43:38 -0700 Received: (qmail 51301 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2005 16:43:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.100.15?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 9 Aug 2005 16:43:11 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 206.80.1.253 Message-ID: <42F8DB43.50206@electricjellyfish.net> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 09:35:15 -0700 From: Garrett Rooney User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brad Nicholes CC: Paul Querna , dev@apr.apache.org, dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: RTC killed the open source project References: <9BD7F77F-80BB-4A7A-B506-5118CC577623@jaguNET.com> <42F7C264.7050503@wstoddard.com> <42F7C4A6.5070205@force-elite.com> <8DD2B7D9-5F47-4C02-9B62-FEAE467893F2@clove.org> <3F28B1B6-B478-4688-8D95-F0246EFE2896@clove.org> <42F8D0FB.8000107@domdv.de> <42F8D459.6020600@force-elite.com> <20050809161613.GA2687@redhat.com> <42F883C3.6720.00AC.0@novell.com> <42F8D93B.1030306@force-elite.com> <42F8877C.6720.00AC.0@novell.com> In-Reply-To: <42F8877C.6720.00AC.0@novell.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Brad Nicholes wrote: > But on the other hand, there shouldn't be a reason why apr-util can't be > released at anytime regardless of why. If there is a linkage between > apr 1.2.0 and apr-util 1.2.0 that just means that they happen to be > released at the same time. There is nothing sacred about what the > version numbers happen to be or if they happen to be the same. If > apr-dbd isn't ready to be released yet but apr-util is, then where is > the real hold up? apr-dbd is part of apr-util, it isn't its own separate library, it has to be released as part of apr-util. -garrett