apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: Reducing #ifdef burden on APR applications
Date Wed, 24 Aug 2005 03:59:20 GMT
At 02:30 PM 8/23/2005, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

>...  The application can then decide what to do in the presence of the APR_ENOTIMPL case
- in this case, we can document that apr_thread_* foo can return APR_ENOTIMPL if the underlying
OS doesn't support it.  As Jeff said, we let the app (or library) decide what to do from there.
 -- justin

Yes, as long as we all understand this is an apr version
major bump (e.g., 2.0).  A behavior change is equivalent
to breaking the ABI.


View raw message