apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: SHA1 update v.s. update_binary
Date Thu, 04 Aug 2005 16:55:41 GMT
At 08:41 AM 8/4/2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

>It strikes me that the sha1 and md5 implementations are inconsistent,
>it seems that in apr 2.0 we should probably provide the same xlate
>handle to a given sha1_ctx_t as we have done for md5_ctx_t.  I'm not
>sure we can make such a transition before an apr 2.

And in fact, apr_sha1_ctx_t is quite transparent, so any change to
introduce the same apr_xlate_t object into that structure -must-
wait for 2.0 :-/

Bill




Mime
View raw message